<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Throw Away Code (aka Spike Solution)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.david-yancey.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/06/throw-away-code-aka-spike-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.david-yancey.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/06/throw-away-code-aka-spike-solution/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on .NET, Agile and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david.yancey</title>
		<link>http://www.david-yancey.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/06/throw-away-code-aka-spike-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>david.yancey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.david-yancey.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/06/throw-away-code-aka-spike-solution/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Another great example of where you can use this practice.  Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great example of where you can use this practice.  Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.david-yancey.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/06/throw-away-code-aka-spike-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>John Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 11:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.david-yancey.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/06/throw-away-code-aka-spike-solution/#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Michael Feathers uses this method (in Working Effectively with Legacy Code) when attempting to understand a system before refactoring it to put it under test. I think he called it &#039;scratch programming&#039;. He will hack into the code he is using applying tests to ascertain system behaviour and throw it away. I think it can be effective and I guess the use case I apply it too most often is fixing defects in complex code. I take the problem, isolate it, produce a proof of concept to reproduce and then I can apply different fixes to it without the worry of any other dependencies interfering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Feathers uses this method (in Working Effectively with Legacy Code) when attempting to understand a system before refactoring it to put it under test. I think he called it &#8216;scratch programming&#8217;. He will hack into the code he is using applying tests to ascertain system behaviour and throw it away. I think it can be effective and I guess the use case I apply it too most often is fixing defects in complex code. I take the problem, isolate it, produce a proof of concept to reproduce and then I can apply different fixes to it without the worry of any other dependencies interfering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
